RailPAC
Contacts
Publications
Issues
Meeting Reports
2006 Reports
2006/12 Canadian
2006/11 Capitol
2006/11 San Joaquin
2006/11 TAMC
2006/11 Psgr Trains
2006-10-28
2006-11 Chief
2006-10 RailPAC
2006-10 Capitol
2006-10 Coast
2006-10 San Joaquin
2006-09 Capitol
2006-08 ACE
2006-07 Trip 1/2
2006-07 Trip 2/2
2006-07 Daylight
2006-07-13 San Joaquin
2006-06 Coast Rail
2006-06 Capitol
2006-06 TAMC
2006-06 Palm Springs
2006-06 Special
2006-05-11 San Joaquin
2006-05-10 LOSSAN
2006-05 TAMC
2006-04 Coast Rail
2006-04 SCAG Maglev
2006-03-09 San Joaquin
2006-02-15 Capitol
2006-02 Coast and TAMC
2006 Annual Meeting
2006-01-12 San Joaquin
Membership
Links
|
Meeting Report and Commentary
San Joaquin Valley Rail Committee
Fresno, 9 March 2006
Reported by Russ Jackson
- HOT RUMORS in Washington DC are that Norman Mineta will resign as DOT
Secretary "in the next 30 days," and Congressman Bill Thomas, (R-Bakersfield)
who announced his retirement this month, will become the next Secretary of
the Treasury if Secretary Snow resigns. No speculation about a replacement for
Secretary Mineta if the rumor is correct. (NOTE: As of the posting of this
report after April 1 neither rumor had been confirmed.)
- SAN JOAQUIN TRAIN 712 that many of us rode to the meeting arrived in
Fresno 6 minutes EARLY. Excellent dispatching. However, train 715 that
brought us back north was delayed 45 minutes at the Fresno station because the BNSF
had a minor derailment a mile north of the station. Committee Chairman,
Fresno County Supervisor Bob Waterston, opened the meeting by recognizing the 712's
early arrival, saying, "People are paying attention to us, and we are all
focused on the same thing" of providing service to the Valley.
- RailPAC PRESIDENT, PAUL DYSON, spoke to the meeting introducing
himself and commented not only on RailPAC but he spoke about how "we have a lot to
crow about; rail is finally on the agenda" all over the state as well as the
Valley and across the nation. "We can do more by thinking up alternatives to
promote mobility." It must be a "service." He went on to describe the growth
that has taken place in the railroad industry in the past 5 to 10 years, which
"makes it harder to accomplish goals for passenger rail." We must "figure
out how to make it work." In response to committee member questions, Mr. Dyson
pointed out what the philosophy was at British Rail, where he learned the
business, which is to be "expeditious and punctual." The public-private
partnership is vital to the future, and while we must "play the hand we're dealt," the
future looks good. Chairman Waterston thanked Mr. Dyson for his remarks,
following up by pointing out that "capacity is a big issue. We (passenger rail)
seem to be on the back burner, I am encouraged, but it can't all be on state
money."
- This being the COMMITTEE'S ANNUAL MEETING, the election of a Chairman
and Vice Chairman for the next year was held. Bakersfield Mayor Harvey Hall
is the new Chairman, and Merced County Supervisor John Pedrozo will be Vice
Chairman. Mayor Hall took the gavel.
- Although it took a request for information by Kings County Committee
member Dick Hauck toward the end of the meeting, the subject of THE DEBACLE
INVOLVING TRAIN 704 BEING STUCK OVERNIGHT on a siding at the Turlock/Denair
station on February 23 (the photo above shows train 712 at that station on March
9) while carrying a group of students from Corcoran Elementary school was
discussed as was expected. In what Caltrans' Bill Bronte described as "a colossal
example of Murphy's Law repeating itself all night," fault cannot be placed at
any one spot. Starting with whoever placed tie plates on the UP tracks just
north of Stockton that ruptured the fuel tank on the train where there was no
bus availability, the difficulty of the three railroads (UP, BNSF, and Amtrak)
to move the train where passengers could be transferred with it ending up
being required to go to the UP Stockton yard, the fortuitous placing of an Amtrak
trainset at the Stockton station because of the tie replacement project, the
extra time it took to make all the moves transferring the passengers to the
new train, the failure to arrive before the BNSF's construction window opened
and which was not to expire until 2 AM but closed early by direction of the
railroad management, the unavailability of buses that evening from anywhere
nearby, the Amtrak crew on the replacement train going up on their allowable hours
when they reached Turlock/Denair, the inability to find a replacement crew in
time, (an Amtrak conductor was found but no engineer), the donated BNSF
engineer who said he was "not qualified on the Amtrak equipment" after he arrived at
the scene, and the usual lack of prompt notification of the passengers and the
school in Corcoran. Is that enough? The end result was the train did not
depart Turlock/Denair until dawn, 12 hours late. Several Amtrak managers, some
who were involved that night, were present at the meeting to say their side of
this unfortunate story. The Oakland CNOC did everything it could to help
this situation, but one bad event led to another that night. The BNSF's Rick
Depler personally intervened during the night to allow their engineer to be sent
to the scene and to get the construction window closed early. Amtrak provided
food to the passengers, the power remained on, the kids communicated with
their parents by their own cell phones, and Amtrak Acting President Hughes called
the school to apologize. Needless to say all fares were refunded. A
thorough review of procedures is underway. Mr. Hauck said he had learned what he
needed to know.
- A RESOLUTION was introduced by Tulare County member Ty Holscher which
called for initiating a "commuter" rail service on the UP's main line in the
Valley. That route serves communities that the current service on the BNSF
misses. Mr. Holscher made an passionate plea, saying it should be a service
like Metrolink or ACE, and cover the Merced-Fresno-Bakersfield corridor. "It's
time for it to become a reality," he said, "This is the first step. Reality
says it won't be easy. We are underserved, and the affected counties are
supportive." He emphasized that he is not calling for moving the existing Amtrak
service to the UP line, that this is a new service. Committee Facilitator,
Arthur Lloyd, pointed out that Amtrak cannot by law run a "commuter" service, only
one designated as "intercity." They can only contract with another agency to
run one, so the counties will have to form a plan for such service and secure
funding. Supervisor Alene Taylor from Kings County asked whether "we should
beat our heads on a project that may not have a high priority." Fresno member
Larry Miller said "it would be better to do projects incrementally to benefit
the UP as well as Amtrak service." Amtrak's Liz O'Donoghue reminded the
group that "funding is a very important issue, as costs can fall on the counties
through which the trains pass." Other speakers were supportive of the idea,
and the Committee voted to send the resolution to its Technical Advisory
sub-committee for more work.
- RICK DEPLER, FROM THE BNSF's PASSENGER DEPARTMENT in Ft. Worth spoke
in response to some criticism spoken earlier, saying his railroad "cares." His
job is "only taking care of passenger rail. We want to work as a partner." As
for On Time Performance of the trains, he noted that in February the
Southwest Chief that runs on the BNSF was "on time 89.3%," which they are very proud
of. The San Joaquins in February, however, were still being affected by the tie
replacement project in the Valley (they fell to 36.3%), and the UP was also
doing track work on both sides of their line which affected the trains. The
BNSF's new dispatch system is on line and trains are doing much better. They
see a retirement of veteran dispatchers, and the resulting inexperience of new
hires. A new safety system to prevent collisions, detect broken rails, etc.,
by use of GPS is being tested. Other railroads including Amtrak are looking at
the BNSF system, and it could "revolutionize the way railroads are run."
- ON THE MARKETING FRONT, Committee member Stacey Mortensen, who also
heads ACE, reported on the startup of their 4th train. Eric Schatmeier from
Caltrans reported that this is a "partnership expansion," as this train will
"replace a current Amtrak feeder bus from Stockton to San Jose," making all-rail
travel from destinations on the San Joaquins (except for the shuttle from
Stockton ACE to the Stockton Amtrak station). It will start on July 1. Mr.
Schatmeier also reported record ridership in February, up 21% over last year
despite the tie replacement project. The big news from Amtrak was that "Amtrak.com
is now available in Spanish!" New promotion partnerships include Radio
Disney with a train trip on May 6 Fresno to Sacramento with Disney characters on
board, and with participating Applebees restaurants offering two for one coupons
on the San Joaquins as well as on the Surfliners.
- CALTRANS DIVISON OF RAIL CHIEF, BILL BRONTE, said that in the US
Senate, bill S 1615, may not be heard this year. Senator Lott (R-MS) has
requested floor time to consider it, but that bill must get in line with others. The
current three priorities, of course, are "Iraq, Homeland Security, and
everything else." The latter category is not going to get increases, but, Mr. Bronte
says, Amtrak is in a better position this year than last as it's "easier to
get to last year's 1.3 billion from 900 million than it is to get there from
zero." He went on to emphasize that California expects other states to pay
their share in the future (the NEC, he meant) and that California will be paying
on the basis of "fully allocated costs" next year so is expecting a larger bill
from Amtrak. Mr. Bronte is "already working on the 2008 budget, so has
written to Amtrak to get the figures he needs." He was astounded to learn that the
50-plus California Congressional delegation has been characterized as not
knowing much about the state rail program, so his office is preparing a
presentation for them. Liz O'Donoghue spoke about state funding, and discussed the
bond issue legislation that was under consideration in Sacramento that day. (By
now the finished product is out, so this writer won't outline it here.) When
legislators are approached about supporting passenger rail one of the first
questions asked is "will it affect air quality." We all know the answer to
that: "positively," particularly as newer locomotives are introduced.
The next meeting of the San Joaquin Valley Rail Committee will be on May 11,
probably in Merced if it can be arranged.
|